Late to Regulate
Meanwhile, hundreds of new pharmaceuticals, industrial solvents, fertilizers, and other new chemicals enter the US economy (and water supply) every year. You probably haven’t heard of most of these, and while many chemicals in your water are likely safe, some of them are certainly not.
Unfortunately, regulations are in a game of catch-up with the chemicals our economy releases into the environment. This means many potential toxins go unmonitored in our pipes, and indeed unregulated in your drinking water.
Looking back, here’s a short list of dangerous chemicals that took way too long to regulate:
1. Lead Regulation ↠ 100 Years
-
1887 - US Authorities Diagnose Lead Poisoning In Children
-
1904 - Lead Paint Diagnosed As Source Of Lead Poisoning
-
1978 - US Government Bans Lead Paint [1]
2. Arsenic Regulation ↠ 100 Years
-
1888 - Fowler’s Solution (a once popular arsenic-containing-medicine) proven to cause cancers.
-
1968 - Research in Taiwan shows connection between arsenic in drinking water and cancer.
-
2001 - US EPA regulates arsenic in drinking water to 10 parts per billion (PPB).[2]
3. PCB’s ↠ 50 Years
-
1933 - 95% of workers in PCB factory develop strong reactions to PCB manufacturing.
-
1966 - Scientists declare PCB’s a “worldwide environmental problem”
-
1979 - US EPA bans the manufacture of PCB’s.[3]
4. 1,2,3 TCP ↠ 80+ (still not regulated)
-
1940’s - Manufactured by Dow for use as a pesticide and solvent.
-
2009 - 1,2,3 TCP is declared a carcinogen.[4]
-
2017 - California begins to regulate 1,2,3 TCP amid controversy.[4]
There are more than 100 contaminants currently regulated by the US EPA under public water system protections provided by the US Safe Drinking Water Act.[5][6] Our water laws aren't perfect but they are some of the best in the world. This shows just what an uphill battle regulators face when trying to keep the public safe.
There are thousands of new chemicals introduced into the environment by industry every year. Each chemical contaminant has a story and SimpleLab is doing the difficult of structuring that information in a way that lets us perform state of the art health analysis and generate informative Tap Score Reports.
Sources
▾- Lead Poisoning: A Historical Perspective | About EPA
- Drinking Water Arsenic Rule History | US EPA
- Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) | US EPA
- California is finally going to regulate a carcinogen it identified as cancerous 25 years ago
- National Primary Drinking Water Regulations
- Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) | US EPA
back to top
Related Articles
-
Water Test Results: Why They Vary and Why it Matters
Whether you’re a repeat customer comparing results of several water tests, or just want to know more about factors that can cause variability in water chemistry, this quick guide will...
-
Quick Guide: Trihalomethanes and HAA5/HAA9
Chlorine remains the leading method of water disinfection in the United States due to its cost-effectiveness. However, chlorination may result in some unintended consequences. Read more to learn about disinfection...
-
What Is The Difference Between MCLG and MCL?
There are thousands of acronyms used by the EPA, water engineers, and public health practitioners. We're here to provide clarity on some of these important water-related acronyms that you'll see...
Shop our most
popular tests
- I Have City Water
- City Water
- I Have Well Water
- Well Water
Essential City Water Test
Basic test panel for water utility customers primarily concerned by metals, aging pipes, and infrastructure.
Advanced City Water Test
Ideal baseline for testing tap water provided by a local water utility–including metals, minerals, and chlorine-related byproducts.
Extended City Water Test
Comprehensive testing for the core concerns impacting utility-provided tap water, plus analysis of radioactive particles and additional disinfection byproducts.
